The https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ repo is already being used for distributing releases and has been for some time. It still appears to be the infra / foundation documented route for publishing releases.
However https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ is itself a Subversion repo, is that causing some confusion here? If not, what am I missing? I believe all the components use a git repo for their sources: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#activemq Robbie On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 06:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > When I did ActiveMQ 5.15.x releases, I didn’t use svn but dist.apache.org > <http://dist.apache.org/>. > > What part of the release process use svn ? > > Regards > JB > > > Le 30 mars 2020 à 22:13, Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > Any thoughts on changing the release process for each project to get away > > from using Subversion and migrate to the use of > > https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist ? > > > > Bruce > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:59 AM Bruce Snyder <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> It has come to my attention that Subversion is still being used for > >> ActiveMQ project releases. Most projects have migrated to using > >> https://dist.apache.org.org/repos/dist for uploading releases, and, in > >> fact, the ASF Infra team confirmed that this is the new standard. Is it > >> possible to move our release processes toward the use of Git releases so > >> that we can completely forgo the use of Subversion? > >> > >> Bruce > >> -- > >> perl -e 'print > >> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > >> > >> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > >> > > > > > > -- > > perl -e 'print > > unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' > > > > Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >
