It’s already on the way, I started the review and merge one already. Regards JB
> Le 6 mai 2020 à 08:23, Colm O hEigeartaigh <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi JB, > > I have a bunch of outstanding PRs that should be considered for inclusion > in the releases: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pulls/coheigea > > Also, see my earlier message about the possibility of disabling the REST > API for 5.16.0 by default. > > Otherwise, +1 from me. > > Colm. > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:31 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to release ActiveMQ 5.15.13 and 5.16.0. >> >> They include fixes affecting several users (on http proxy, on xstream CPU >> use, etc) and couple of improvements. >> >> About 5.16.0, we have two options: >> 1. I’m releasing as it is: it’s JDK 11 compliant at runtime, but the build >> is not fully JDK 11. >> 2. I’m removing leveldb, scala, and update the branch to fully build with >> JDK 11. I can postpone this for 5.17.x with JMS 2.x support (already >> started). >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB
