As long as it is well tested and widely used I'm fine using it.

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:11 PM michael.andre.pearce
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Fastutil is well used in finance orgs, ive seen it used in a few companies
> in critical areas, i dont have any concerns. Its fairly well battle
> tested.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> -------- Original message --------From: Francesco Nigro <
> [email protected]> Date: 01/05/2020  12:34  (GMT+00:00) To:
> [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION/VOTE] Primitive
> specialized collections in Java It's a fair point: yes is a professor of
> the Unimilano university, but isthe whole university (similar to MIT) that
> collaborate to maintain it.He has built the template to autogenerate the
> different types ofcollections and the library itself exists from many years
> (> 10 years),used especially in the low latency space due to the low
> footprint andpredictable performance of collections.In case we believe
> isn't going to be maintained (very unlikely after somany years) we can
> return back to use java common collections, given thatthe signature is the
> same most of the time.Il ven 1 mag 2020, 13:12 Christopher Shannon <
> [email protected]> ha scritto:> This library just seems to
> be only maintained by a single person, not sure> we really want to tie
> ourselves to a library like that which would have a> high likelihood of
> becoming unmaintained at some point.>> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:35 AM
> Krzysztof <[email protected]> wrote:>> > Yes, that's a shame that Java
> doesn't have out of the box (no pun> intended)> > support for collections
> of primitive types.> >> > +1> >> > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:13 PM
> nigro_franz <[email protected]> wrote:> >> > > Hi,> > >> > > Recently I
> am struggling to reduce the memory footprint while loading> the> > >
> Artemis journal, mostly due to a Java limitations of providing> efficient>
> > > data-structures using primitive types.> > > In particular I would like
> a linked hash map implementation using long> > keys> > > and I am aware
> only of http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/ that implement it.> > > I think we
> have many parts in the code that would benefit from saving> > >
> Long/Integer boxed types to lower the memory footprint of the broker,> but>
> > > such library is a 18 MB jar...!!!!> > > I am +1 to use it and will soon
> send a PR to show the benefits but I am> > > open> > > to discuss/vote any
> opinion> > >> > > Thanks,> > > Franz> > >> > >> > >> > > --> > > Sent
> from:> > >
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html> > >> >>

Reply via email to