so, if we switched to JDK 11 on the CI, those would still work with
the trick you used?

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <ehugo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I changed the way the classloaders where working with JDK 11 using the 
> plateform classloader as the parent instead of null so that I could
> access the required modules.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Le 29/05/2020 à 17:37, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
> > We should come back into this...
> >
> >
> > How did you fix the compatibility tests with JDK 11? do you need JDK 8
> > to run the compatibility tests?
> >
> > On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 3:19 PM Emmanuel Hugonnet <ehugo...@redhat.com> 
> > wrote:
> >> No relation to WildFly, just for the 'fun' of it and because switching my 
> >> JAVA_HOME and PATH each time I wxanted to build was itching me too
> >> much ;)
> >>
> >> It can wait and get some baking :)
> >>
> >> Emmanuel
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 08/05/2020 à 19:47, Clebert Suconic a écrit :
> >>> Oh wow.. that's awesome.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can we do the migration after the 2.13.0 release? I have pretty much
> >>> everything ready to go (besides a few changes we have to make next
> >>> week). doing this migration now would probably delay the release.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Or you have some requirement for Wildfly that you must do this now? if
> >>> you do we can eventually delay it.. but I would prefer doing it for
> >>> later.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:24 AM Emmanuel Hugonnet <ehugo...@redhat.com> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> When i need to work on Apache ActiveMQ Artemis I need to switch my local 
> >>>> environement to use OpenJDK 8 instead of the default OpenJDK 11
> >>>> which I use to develop.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have started a branch 
> >>>> https://github.com/ehsavoie/activemq-artemis/tree/java_11 which builds 
> >>>> on OpenJDK 8 and 11 with the fast-tests profile.
> >>>>
> >>>> mvn clean install -Pfast-tests is passing for me locally :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't think that the CI or the release should use Java 11 but I hope 
> >>>> this will smoothen the time when the migration occurs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also I couldn't use the --release 8 flag for OpenJDK 11 because of the 
> >>>> use of Unsafe, if someone has a better alternative I'm all hears.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you want me to sumbit a PR for this ? Does this make sense to the 
> >>>> community ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Emmanuel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
>


-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to