+1 (Binding)

Using release binary
  Ran some nms openwire smoke tests
  Ran some jms openwire smoke tests
  
Validated checksums



Sent from my iPad

> On 25 Jun 2020, at 17:45, Christopher Shannon 
> <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1, looks good to me
> 
> * Validated signatures and checksums
> * Verified license headers on source using 'mvn apache-rat:check'
> * Ran smoke tests
> * Verified broker starts properly using tar.gz release
> * Verified several of my own tests that I have pass successfully
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:58 AM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Thank you, JB!
>> 
>>   * Downloaded apache-activemq-5.16.0-unix.tar.gz and validated SHA1 sum
>>   * Tested startup / shutdown
>>   * Various message testing
>> 
>> -Matt Pavlovich
>> 
>>> On Jun 25, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0
>>> release to your vote (take #2).
>>> 
>>> This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports JDK 11.
>>> The full build with JDK 11 is planned for 5.17.0.
>>> 
>>> It also includes bunch of fixes, improvements and much more.
>>> 
>>> For your information, once this vote will pass, I will create
>>> activemq-5.16.x branch and I will move master branch to version 5.17.0.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12341032
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1213/
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.16.0/
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.16.0
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to