Test cases for nms openwire are currently focussed on testing against activemq classic, with sql backend, thus you should have a testdbconfig also.
There is no change in these setups for testing that from previous releases. This has mostly just been a update in .net support. Sent from my iPad > On 25 Aug 2020, at 18:52, W B D <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've already built it, no problem there, but some tests are failing > (Windows 10, Visual Studio 2019 16.7.1): > > - First two failed tests are AMQRedeliveryPolicyTest and > BrokerToNMSExceptionsTest, maybe because my local test broker is Artemis > rather than Classic? That doesn't mean it's incompatible with Artemis, but > that some tests may be assuming Classic behaviour. > - Several other failed tests reference a missing config > file C:\WINDOWS\System32\test\TestDbConfig.xml in the error message - not > sure what that's about. > > >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:00 PM Havret <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> No, I don't think so. For what it's worth you could just take the binaries >> I created for rc1 attempt, and start testing against that. >> >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:16 AM W B D <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> If I am targeting Windows, are there any changes expected that would >> affect >>> me, or are they just Linux related packaging / file permissions + some >>> issues in the text of the LICENSE and NOTICE files? If that's all it is, >>> I'm thinking perhaps I will get the jump on this by building from source >>> and testing already. >>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 2:20 PM Havret <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It will, but I will need to find some time to go through Robbie's >>> remarks. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:29 PM W B D <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Will there be an RC2 or a release forthcoming? I ported to .NET Core >>> last >>>>> spring, currently using William D Cossey's fork, which is a straight >>> port >>>>> of 1.7.x to NetStd. Looking forward to switch back to the newly >>>> refactored >>>>> official version once it's stabilized and ready to test. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 8:26 AM Havret <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Robbie. I'm canceling the vote then. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:26 PM Robbie Gemmell < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> -1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The zip has similar permission issues seen on prior NMS related >>>>>>> candidates when extracting on Linux, meaning you can extract the >>> zip >>>>>>> but then can't simply delete the resulting content (which would >>> again >>>>>>> be easier if contained in a subdir). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The LICENCE file looks to include various cruft it shouldn't (in >>>>>>> particular various Java stuff sticks out, plus there are multiple >>>>>>> needless copies of the ALv2...seems like a lot of this isnt NMS >>>>>>> relevant). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The NOTICE file needs its years updated, component name fixed, >> the >>>>>>> silly header removed, and perhaps the content looked at for >>> accuracy >>>>>>> (is that referenced component actually included, not clear it >> is?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I also dont see a tag relating to the vote. There were some >>>>>>> release-related source changes made in the source repo after the >>>>>>> archives were added to dist dev area, though I think those were >> in >>>> the >>>>>>> archive? They'd need to be if required to recreate the release >>> bits. >>>> A >>>>>>> tag should exist for whats in it either way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Robbie >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 at 18:36, Havret <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please >>>>>>>> check it and vote accordingly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This release brings .NET Standard 2.0 support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The files can be grabbed from: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-openwire/1.8.0-rc1/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Krzysztof >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
