If I didn't include a NOTICE I agree it would be a breaker..

However I am not sure the YEAR "typo" on this case does not break the license...

I won't be able to cut another release until tomorrow anyways. I will
let others to chime in on the issue before I Cancel it.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:05 PM Michael André Pearce
<michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
>
> “
> The top of each NOTICE file should include the following text, suitably 
> modified to reflect the product name and year(s) of distribution of the 
> current and past versions of the product:
> “
>
> As such by forming a new release we would be distributing in 2021 the notice 
> file must include this year.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 10 Feb 2021, at 21:44, Michael André Pearce 
> > <michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
> >
> > I believe it is. As it’s legal license stuff
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> >> On 10 Feb 2021, at 21:41, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is that really a release blocker?
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 4:34 PM Michael André Pearce
> >>> <michael.andre.pea...@me.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I think I have to be bearer of bad news, I was looking at the notice 
> >>> file, it’s out of date. The range needs to be until 2021 now.
> >>>
> >>> -1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPad
> >>>
> >>>>> On 10 Feb 2021, at 15:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> I’m quick check the build and started the broker.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks !
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>>> Le 9 févr. 2021 à 23:35, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> a 
> >>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.17.0 release
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a summary of the improvements as part of 2.17.0:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Message-level authorization similar to ActiveMQ 5.x.
> >>>>> - A count of addresses and queues is now available from the management 
> >>>>> API.
> >>>>> - You can now reload the broker's configuration from disk via the
> >>>>> management API rather than waiting for the periodic disk scan to pick
> >>>>> it up
> >>>>> - Performance improvements on libaio journal.
> >>>>> - New command-line option to transfer messages.
> >>>>> - Performance improvements for the wildcard address manager.
> >>>>> - JDBC datasource property values can now be masked.
> >>>>> - Lots of usability improvements to the Hawtio 2 based web console
> >>>>> introduced in 2.16.0
> >>>>> - New management method to create a core bridge using JSON-based
> >>>>> configuration input.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The release notes can be found here:
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12349326
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ths git commit report is here:
> >>>>> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.17.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.17.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Maven repository is here:
> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1224
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >>>>> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The source tag:
> >>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.17.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.17.0
> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to