Hey Clebert- I chatted with a member of INFRA team and it sounds like they have a process now. He indicated that access can be used for jenkins and deployment pipelines.
I’ve got an INFRA ticket open and asked for info on best practices / approved procedures for release. Watch the AMQ-8149 ticket and I’ll post notes there and on this thread for discuss. -Matt > On Feb 16, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > the issue I had before when I tried this was that Apache is about the > "source is the release" > > When I looked with Apache Infra for tools on making official images, > everything was about the TAG on the source, not allowing us much > "build" for the image. > > Did anything change on Apache Infra Structure recently allowing for > more complex builds and binary build on the images? > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:17 AM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello Chuck- >> >> I created JIRA here to manage discussion for an ActiveMQ 5.x image: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8149 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8149> >> >> Thanks! >> -Matt >> >>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:49 AM, Shank, Charles R <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Jean, >>> >>> I agree we should make this its own issue and open up the discussion to the >>> ActiveMQ community >>> >>> Currently, we are working on the following repository to provide generic >>> images available to the ActiveMQ community. You can follow our progress >>> here: https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq >>> <https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq> >>> >>> Because the needs of the community are varied, we recommend making multiple >>> versions of ActiveMQ classic and Artemis. The repos also will be created >>> to include OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. We also recommend leaving room for >>> other operating systems other than Debian and multiple versions of JDK >>> within both OpenJDK and AdoptopenJDK. >>> >>> Given the number of options, we are not sure how we would go about using a >>> module to maintain the dockerfiles, but would be open to it. Once we get >>> our dockerimages complete, we can discuss how they are maintained going >>> forward. We will also investigate with the folks at >>> https://github.com/docker-library <https://github.com/docker-library> to >>> see what is required to get our images listed as the official images. I >>> have a coworker that is responsible for the TomEE official images and has >>> some contacts there. >>> >>> We would like to get the communities thoughts and input on this course of >>> action. >>> >>> Thank you >>> Chuck Shank >>> >>> <image001.gif> >>> <image002.gif> >> > > > -- > Clebert Suconic
