For ActiveMQ "5", as we have the Jenkinsfile in the repo directly, it should be smooth for the CI jobs.
Regards JB > Le 5 mars 2021 à 20:54, Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> a écrit : > > +1 no problem. Please to cover the CI jobs, so we don’t lose those. Thanks! > >> On Mar 5, 2021, at 11:24 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I would like to propose to rename all of our git branches as main on >> all of our branches. This would be a very first easy step to take on >> renaming offensive language from our codebases. >> >> We could allow some time before we do that, say 7 days after we decide >> to take the move. >> >> Anyone sees a problem with that? >> >> if anyone has internal forks depending on master (say if you have a >> downstream branch of ActiveMQ), you will likely have to update your >> internal git repos and scripts. >> >> We could keep the master for some time without being updated, until we >> remove it later. >
