I'm +1 on the actions :).

Jon

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:11 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Sure, thanks for the help !
>
> Just waiting for some feedback before starting the "actions" ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 12 mars 2021 à 14:29, Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> a écrit :
> >
> > I ran into this test failing yesterday:
> >
> activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/DuplexAdvisoryRaceTest.java
> > - I'd be happy to try and contribute a fix. Would you like to assign the
> > JIRA to me?
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:58 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Now that we have Jenkinsfile in our repo, and we use Jenkins pipeline,
> we
> >> dramatically improved our build: the build is executed for each
> >> PullRequests or commit on the main branch.
> >>
> >> However, we have lot of failing tests, causing quite systematically the
> >> build failing on ci-builds.apache.org.
> >>
> >> We really need to have a clean, accurate and stable build: it will
> improve
> >> the issue detection and simplify the review, especially for
> PullRequests.
> >>
> >> I ran several builds on my machine (with different docker containers)
> and
> >> I already identified some failing/flaky tests:
> >>
> >> -
> >>
> activemq-leveldb-store/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/leveldb/test/ElectingLevelDBStoreTest.java
> >> is not a big deal as I have a PR removing leveled completely
> >> -
> >>
> activemq-stomp/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/transport/stomp/Stomp11NIOSSLTest.java.
> >> Chris did an improvement, but I still have some flakiness here.
> >> -
> >>
> activemq-unit-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/DuplexAdvisoryRaceTest.java
> >>
> >> I propose the following action plan:
> >>
> >> 1. Create the Jira for each failing/flaky tests
> >> 2. Exclude the tests (in surefire plugin configuration) to have a "green
> >> light" on Jenkins.
> >> 3. For each Jira, we work on a PullRequest, to be sure that Jenkins is
> >> still "happy".
> >>
> >> Anyone willing to help on (3) is welcome !
> >>
> >> If there’s no objection, I will start with (1) and (2).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Regards
> >> JB
>
>

Reply via email to