Hi Robbie, Thanks for your feedback.
1. Absolutely about the published artifacts, I will take care of this. 2. January sounds good to me. Thanks again Regards JB > Le 15 mars 2021 à 14:37, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 16:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> We already did (or plan to do soon) some updates addressing CVE fixes, and >> fixing bug. >> >> I’m starting Jira triage now and working on some fixes/improvements. >> >> I would like to release 5.16.2 and 5.15.15 to keep our release pace and also >> to have CVE upgrade done. >> I will work on this during the week end. I would like to submit 5.15.15 >> beginning on next week and 5.16.2 end of next week. >> >> No objection ? > > Sounds good. > > Can you ensure whatever process you are following adapts to avoid the > unexpected mismatch in published artifacts reported previously: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rb56983b47d0455805209434319aac655393ba48df6a7f9df93e16957%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E > >> >> On the other hand, I resume my work on the main branch (5.17.x): >> — test stability improvement (action plan proposed in another thread) >> — leveldb cleanup (PR will be updated soon, I’m running all tests now on my >> machines) >> — JDK11 full upgrade (adding JAXB required dependencies, and other change on >> the build) >> — Spring 5.3.x upgrade >> — Log4J2 upgrade >> I need at least a couple of weeks to have all done. >> >> Maybe we can define 5.15.15 as the last release on the 5.15.x series and >> focus 5.16.x (and 5.17.x). Thoughts ? > > I suggested retiring 5.15.x in January as it just makes sense to me > given the similarities between them, and also concentrating any future > JDK8-supporting efforts down to one stream. Noone argued otherwise > then, so sounds like a plan to me. > >> >> Thanks, >> Regards >> JB
