could anyone to take a look on the builds for ActiveMQ 5.x on
builds.apache.org? I'm not sure what to change there, if there is
anything to change?


I already see a build for main on jenkins.. so it seems the branch
thing from jenkins worked.. but if someone could take a look please?

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 8:53 AM Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I did not have time yesterday and today to change the CIs. Which I plan to do 
> on Monday.  I have a lot of personal stuff over my weekend.  Sorry about 
> that. Hope it’s not a big problem for anyone.
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 5:31 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Branches have been renamed...
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:50 AM Clebert Suconic
>> <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Just to clarify a point.. as I had read my own  message again
>> >
>> > I didn't mean to criticize the module in any way.. I'm just saying the
>> > module had its service during some time when we still had users moving
>> > from 1.x towards 2.x... but as the new address model is well
>> > established now...  the conversion tool is not needed any longer.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:43 AM Clebert Suconic
>> > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > This is a heads up as I am strongly opinionated about this (Meaning it
>> > > seems obvious to me) :) (However if you have a strong opinion against
>> > > it.. I'm open to hear it :) )
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Artemis-tools was created to migrate addresses and queues from an
>> > > artemis 1.x into an artemis 2.x. It was done back in 2016 by Martyn
>> > > Taylor.. and it's defunct at this point anyways.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I am going to remove it from the main branch and future releases.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Users can still use *any* older version of the tool if it has any use.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The issue I have with that is that there's a duplicate of
>> > > artemis-server.xsd and artemis-configuration.xsd, and IDEs keep
>> > > getting that version instead.. what makes it quite annoying.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Instead of fixing it and having a single version, since the module is
>> > > defunct anyways, I am going to remove it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > If you're against the change, please let me know (with a strong
>> > > argument if you have an against opinion ;) ).
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Clebert Suconic
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Clebert Suconic
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clebert Suconic
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Reply via email to