Vote tomorrow sounds good on 5.16.2. I'll review both at the same time since they have similar fixes.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:38 AM JB Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys > > To provide you context: > > 1. After two takes, I think it makes sense to finalize 5.15.15 with take 3 > 2. 5.15.15 is expected by users (we had a message on the mailing list) > 3. 5.16.2 is almost ready (I’m doing tests now). I will submit it to vote > tomorrow (my time). > > Regards > JB > > > Le 20 avr. 2021 à 15:15, Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > > I can find some time to have a go with that today. If its just an > > --add-opens needed then it sounds straightforward enough. If it's more > > complicated, I agree, I'd be in favour of doing the release and fixing > this > > right after. > > > > Jon > > > >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:10 PM Christopher Shannon < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I think just AMQ-8220 which if not an easy fix I think could wait until > >> 5.16.3 so we can get it out. > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Is there anything blocking a 5.16.2 release that anyone could help out > >>> with? Happy to try and help. > >>> > >>> Jon > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 2:03 PM Christopher Shannon < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Just to clarify, I'm not saying to cancel this vote for 5.16.2, I > think > >>>> it's ok to have both. Doing the releases simultaneously and > announcing > >>>> together makes sense to me and I will happily vote +1 on both if > >>> everything > >>>> checks out. I just don't think it's a good idea to wait on 5.16.2 at > >> this > >>>> point and do 5.15.15 first for the reasons discussed previously. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:39 AM Christopher Shannon < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I will -1 this unless a 5.16.2 vote is also started shortly. > >>>>> > >>>>> We have now had numerous discussions about why 5.16.2 should be > >>> released > >>>>> first and you have agreed to do it first now on multiple occasions. > >>>> Robbie > >>>>> has made this point several times. The reason we did not do it before > >>>> was a > >>>>> blocker with redelivery that is now fixed. Waiting for JDK 16 support > >>> is > >>>>> not a reason to hold up 5.16.2 as it can go into 5.16.3. Or it can > >> just > >>>> be > >>>>> done first and then do 5.16.2. > >>>>> > >>>>> The priority for releases needs to be the latest which is the 5.16.x > >>>>> branch. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 3:00 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 to your vote (third attempt). We > >>> fixed > >>>>>> the issue identified in AMQ-8226 and this is a new take (#3) on > >>> 5.15.15 > >>>>>> release. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This release includes important fixes and updates, especially: > >>>>>> - Shiro, Spring, xstream, jetty upgrades > >>>>>> - fixes on WebConsole when destination name contains + > >>>>>> - fixes and improvements on the Karaf features to avoid breaking > >> Karaf > >>>>>> http commands and refresh > >>>>>> - improved serialization security to avoid impact on xstream ack > >>>>>> processing > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ > >>>>>> < > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1228/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The dist staging repository is: > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/ < > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.15/> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Git tag: > >>>>>> activemq-5.15.15 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks ! > >>>>>> Regards > >>>>>> JB > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
