Hi Rich,

I can’t speak for the PMC and in particular for the progress made on Artemis, 
but for 5.X I can offer the following:

  *   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514 was created to address the 
terminology used within ActiveMQ
  *   The mainline branch for both repositories is now “main”
  *   You reminded me to open a PR<https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/679> 
with some of the configuration changes/logging as outlined in phase 1.

There’s definitely more work to be done, and I’m personally happy to step up 
and take a more active effort in driving the changes forward within the project.

Look forward to hearing from the committers!

Étienne Hossack
Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ
email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

[cid:[email protected]]

On Jul 8, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Rich Bowen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
content is safe.



Hi, folks,

Back in November I sent email to this list [1] about usage of words such as 
master, slave, blacklist, etc, in the Activemq project. My impression is that, 
since that time, you have made considerable progress on those changes. I was 
wondering if you could tell me where we are in this?

I have noticed that more and more projects are getting to a point here they can 
no longer make further progress because word uses are dictated by 
upstream/dependencies/standards over which they have no direct influence. Is 
that where you've landed, or is this still an ongoing effort?

Thanks for any info.

--Rich


[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2c7b11a07f136fa417cdb5e64c443aa52dc7d0f66c4b9f9ceb9445fa%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E

Reply via email to