The repo is already tagged. Feel free to push anything you like again. I will organize the vote thread and send it out shortly.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 4:40 PM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had test failures because of > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3853#issuecomment-993567992 > > I'm pushing the release for the Wed... > > please lets not push anything big on main between today and tomorrow.. > (small fixes are ok.. but if you have anything big please hold on > pushing on main for a day)... > > > I may wait for a re-send from > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3853... although it > will be optional (depending if it's fixed before tomorrow or not). > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:27 AM Ryan Yeats > <ryan.ye...@octoconsulting.com> wrote: > > > > I would like ARTEMIS-3596 in, I know you have reservations because I was > building off of origin/master which has itest issues, but it passes itests > now that it is rebased off origin/main. > > > > Ryan Yeats > > > > On 12/14/21, 7:02 AM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > a bit late than what I promised but I'm cutting it today... > > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:18 AM Clebert Suconic > > <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I'm thinking about cutting an ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0 tomorrow. > > > > > > Let me know If anyone has anything that would like to be included > ... > > > I will merge some PRs today..but please let me know here of > anything > > > that needs to be included and I can hold accordingly to accomodate > any > > > PRs or JIRAs. > > > > > > I want to make sure we release with ARTEMIS-3587 fixed. hence why I > > > decided to do one sooner. > > > > > > -- > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > [Octo | Jump the Technology Curve.]<https://www.octoconsulting.com/> > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic > -- Clebert Suconic
