It is ActiveMQ Classic. I just went ahead, hoping that it is OK: PR to main branch: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/749
Would it be relevant to also add this as a separate PR to branch 'activemq-5.16.x'? The change is intended to be non-intrusive wrt. existing behaviour. Kind regards, Endre Stølsvik On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 3:04 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which sub project are you referring to? > > > A self contained pull request on GitHub with a test case usually suffices > it. > > Let me know what sub project and I can point you to the GitHub project and > perhaps some other guides. > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:14 PM Endre Stølsvik <en...@stolsvik.com> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I have a small contribution I was hoping that you would consider. > > > > The feature is in the StatisticsBroker(Plugin), where I have added an > > optional request property, which if present will on the reply message > > include the "BrokerInTime" for the first message in the destination, as a > > field "firstMessageTimestamp". > > > > How do you want me to do such a suggestion? Should I first open an issue > / > > feature request, and then do a PR for it, or just submit a PR directly? > > > > Kind regards, > > Endre Stølsvik > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >
