Hi JB- I like the idea of GitHub for issues b/c it eliminates the need for users to create user accounts in Apache JIRA and/or subscribe to the mailing lists.
Feels like mailing lists are falling out of favor for most users and we’d get better engagement with GH. My $0.02. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 13, 2023, at 11:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Even if we are pretty busy and focused on ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release > preparation (as said in another email, I should be able to submit the > release to vote next week), I think we can anticipate a little the > future of ActiveMQ. > ActiveMQ 6.0.0 is a major milestone for the project, heading to a more > modern approach (I started a PoC to remove Spring dep and using SPI > like approach at broker side, I will keep you posted about that) for > the codebase, website, and our developer experience. > > I would like to discuss: > 1. Moving from Apache Jenkins to GitHub Actions, using multiple > workflows, more decoupled, with potentially more "executors" to build > and leveraging GitHub Actions "modules". > 2. Moving from Apache Jira to GitHub Issues. Several Apache projects > already use GitHub Issues. At OPS4J we also migrated from Jira to GH > Issues. We were able to import everything from Jira without losing > data. I think it would also be a good opportunity to do some cleanup, > maybe starting with only tickets for 6.x. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB
