Hey JB -- These JMS 2.0 features are planned for v6.1.0:
AMQ-8464 PR #1046 6.1.0, 5.18.x JMSConsumer .receiveBody(Class) methods AMQ-8320 PR #982 6.1.0, 5.18.x Delivery Delay Support for Message DeliveryDelay feature AMQ-8324 PR #1045 6.1.0, 5.18.x JMSProducer features Completion Listener async send support This would just leave Shared Topic Subscriptions, which is currently planned for v6.2.0. AMQ-8323 6.2.0, 5.18.x Shared Topic Consumer Multi-consumer (queue-like) consuming from topic subscriptions Reference: https://activemq.apache.org/jms2 I think this would work well, since we have Virtual Topic support (which is better anyway). Thanks, Matt > On Dec 2, 2023, at 11:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > Hi > > I think it's really important to focus on JMS 2 complete impl for 6.1.0. > That's the most important. > > I started to work on some impl, a couple are a little longer to impl, > require tests etc. > I don't think early January is reasonable. I would rather try at the > end of January. > > I would rather: > 1. Focus on 6.0.2 for fixes (I'm preparing 5.18.x/5.17.x too as they > include fixes as well) > 2. Focus on 6.1.0 to complete JMS 2.x support. That's probably the > most important (honestly, I'm not a big fan of JMS 2.x support in > ActiveMQ 6.0.x, it could be confusing for users). > > Regards > JB > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 4:10 PM Matt Pavlovich <mattr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> All- >> >> I’ve started organizing some JIRAs for v6.1.0. I’m thinking early-January >> for release target timeframe. >> >> - Additional JMS 2.0 impls >> - New features for observability >> - Code base modernization >> >> Thanks! >> Matt Pavlovich >> >>
