+1 Even though I think Issues are pretty crap, especially with multiple release streams, if thats what the folks regularly working on issues in the repos all want to use...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 18:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Following our previous discussions, I am calling a formal vote on the > proposal to migrate from Jira to GitHub Issues. > > This topic has been discussed extensively over the past few months. For > context, please review the following threads outlining the pros and cons: > > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3cl57zs7xmhk38mpzygp29whmmdbjkw > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/zqp72y8jpsc4q9g9z4skxjyozxs8gr8r > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/9ryfs0y8gnl2z4o2d7q646ffdrs9zzcp > - https://lists.apache.org/thread/93v6b5xxmthsypcwgvhotsmm4y2whdkm > - > https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-website/wiki/Apache-ActiveMQ-GitHub-Issues-Migration-Review > > I would like to gauge the community's support on this topic. Please cast > your vote on the adoption of GitHub Issues instead of Jira: > > [ ] +1 Approve: Migrate to GitHub Issues. > [ ] 0 Neutral: I don't care, or I will abstain. > [ ] -1 Disapprove: Do not approve the migration (Please provide specific > reasons for your objection). > > The vote will remain open for the next 72 hours. > > Thanks, > Regards > JB --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
