So I guess we can just move this to GH discussions then because it will be emailed to the list?
Matt, can you move the issue to a new GH discussion instead? On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 1:03 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > I disagree: if it's a GitHub Discussion back on the dev mailing list, > that's OK. > But this issue is not appropriate here. > > It should be discussed on the mailing list. The issue should contain the > call for action after the discussion on the mailing list. > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 6:36 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Heads up— > > > > I created a GH issue to discuss modernizing the terminology. I believe the > > discussion is too nuanced for the mailing list, so wanted to announce it > > here and invite others to discuss and comment via the GH issue. > > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/issues/1932 > > > > Thanks! > > Matt Pavlovich --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
