My PR that I pushed up over a month ago for index truncation I wanted
to get in as well into 6.4.0

It's just been waiting for a review

Chris


On Mon, Sep 7, 2026 at 10:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It sounds great to me!
>
> Let's rock :)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2026 at 4:06 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I have a PR for Jakarta 3.1/2.0 pool support that I think is ready for 
> > review and would be a good addition to the 6.4.0 release.
> >
> > That sounds good — I made a pass at pruning and sliding other issues and 
> > PRs to 6.5.0. Even after the first pass of pruning, we are sitting on over 
> > 15+ open items and some of those will have heavy review-rework cycles. I 
> > think we’ll need to push out several other items and get that list under 10 
> > to realistically make the timeframe.
> >
> > Current v6.4.0 highlights:
> >
> > 1. JMS 3.1 receiveBody, activemq-pool
> > 2. SSL modernization
> > 3. ClientId authorization
> > 4. Many other fixes and performance improvements
> >
> > -Matt Pavlovich
> >
> > > On Sep 6, 2026, at 1:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I agree.
> > > As said on Slack, I'm volunteering for the 6.4.0 release.
> > >
> > > Instead of next week, I would propose the week after, simply because
> > > we need to include a few new features (receiveBody for instance is
> > > close imho).
> > >
> > > The purpose to have new 6.x "branch" is to include new Jakarta
> > > Messaging 3 features, so, with receiveBody at least, we are good for
> > > 6.4.0 imho.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2026 at 7:59 PM Matt Pavlovich <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> A couple patches came in mid-cycle of the releases this week.
> > >>
> > >> I took a peak at the v6.4.0 project and saw it already had 46 completed 
> > >> issues and PRs. I think we should consider releasing v6.4.0 next instead 
> > >> of a v6.3.x patch.
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Matt Pavlovich
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to