Hi I don't have a strong preference between Docusaurus or Jekyll as soon as the updates/deployments are easy :)
NB: karaf.apache.org has been revamped a little as well. As said previously, we should stick with the plan: Phase 1: use framework to simplify the update (Docusaurus or Jekyll) Phase 2: update look'n feel to have a more modern flavor Phase 3: work on the documentation/content. About this, I strongly believe the documentation should move in the code repo to keep it in sync. For instance, we do that in Polaris or Karaf and it's pretty convenient. Let's focus on Phase 1 & 2 for now. Regards JB On Tue, Nov 3, 2026 at 7:52 PM Matt Pavlovich via dev < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Sérgio. > > The other option would be to look at adding some full-text search on top > of the current Jekyll-based website. I do not have a huge preference either > way. > > A couple other projects recently made big refreshes of stack and theme to > include site search: > > https://wicket.apache.org > https://camel.apache.org > > Thanks, > Matt > > > On Nov 3, 2026, at 12:35 PM, Sérgio Damo de Lemos < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi team, > > > > We have a Docusaurus-based website in > https://activemq-proposal.netlify.app/. > > There were some discussions around which stack to use in > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/issues/2101. Docusaurus has a > > client-side search plugin, which was one of the nice-to-haves. Matt and I > > discussed we should have some validation that a new website still respect > > the same URLs as the existing one (so all the links and bookmarks out > there > > still work, same with search engines), yesterday I prototyped an > automatic > > validation, I will update the PR for the Docusarus website before EOW. > > > > I know there are many static website platforms, I'm ok if the community > > decides for something else. But the Docusaurus is pretty much done. > > > > Sérgio > > > > Em ter., 3 de nov. de 2026 às 11:25, Matt Pavlovich via dev < > > [email protected]> escreveu: > > > >> As we are starting to keep a cadence going on releases, I thought it > might > >> be good to settle on the website tech stack update. > >> > >> I know Sergio has some working sites out there with updated stacks and > >> features. > >> > >> Given the good cadence and updates, I think it would make sense to get > the > >> new website tech stack settled, so as we need new documentation on > features > >> and releases we are doing it on the new site, vs having to continue to > pull > >> forward the changes to the website update PRs. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > >> -Matt Pavlovich > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > >> > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact > > >
