Reviewing differences between v6.4.x and v6.3.x and there are zero changes to 
major dependencies. 

With 6.5.0 underway, I’m thinking we do not need to continue v6.3.x, as v6.4.0 
is the natural upgrade path and adds a number of new security features which we 
would want to encourage users to have around in order to be able to enable them 
as needed.

Dependencies aligned (v6.4.0 and v6.3.3)
JMS API:                3.1.0
Jetty           12.1.12
Spring          7.0.9
Jackson         2.22.4
Log4j2          2.26.1
SLF4J           2.0.20
Jakarta Servlet 6.1.0
Java runtime    17

Thoughts on declaring v6.3.x inactive alongside the v6.5.0 release?  

Thanks,
Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to