Correction: AgensGraph is trademarked.

https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=AgensGraph&OS=AgensGraph&RS=AgensGraph

On 2022/01/03 21:08:14 Josh Innis wrote:
> Hi Felix,
> 
> I believe that dependencies that are not bundled in the release are not
> required. Which would be all the dependencies listed in the two
> package.json files.
> 
> https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled
> 
> For agensGraphRepository.js, the project AgensGraph is distributed under
> the Apache 2.0 license
> https://github.com/bitnine-oss/agensgraph/blob/master/LICENSE. No bundled
> bits are included in the release. A scan of the United Statement Patent and
> Trademark database yields no relevant results.
> 
> We should remove the reference to bitnine/agviewer and either remove the
> section or construct a docker image under the apache name.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 7:29 PM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > lots of dependencies - are these licenses reviewed and handled in the
> > LICENSE file?
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/backend/package.json
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/frontend/package.jso\
> >
> > this requires a component - again could be a LICENSE check, if it is
> > required for execution (at runtime) we should check license of that too.
> > Also what is the trademark on the “AgensGraph” name?
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/backend/src/models/agensgraph/agensGraphRepository.js
> > '@bitnine-oss/ag-driver');
> >
> > The
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/README.md
> > references  to bitnine/agviewer
> > ________________________________
> > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 6:44:11 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE Viewer (incubating) 1.0.0-rc0
> >
> > Looks good to me
> > +1
> >
> > I checked the following:
> >
> > - Signature and hash - check.
> > - DISCLAIMER - check.
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE - check.
> > - No unexpected binary files - check.
> > - incubating in name - check.
> >
> > Best,
> > Eya
> >
> > On 2021/12/23 00:58:26 Alex Kwak wrote:
> > > Dear Apache AGE Community,
> > >
> > > This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc0
> > that we have been working toward it.
> > >
> > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > >
> > > Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
> > > - Graph visualization for AGE.
> > > - Extends edge and vertex point by point.
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote is open now and until December 25th at 5:00 PM PST and passes
> > if a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.6.0
> > > [ ] 0 I won't get in the way
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > >
> > > The git tag to be discussed and voted upon
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0
> > >
> > > The git commit hash:
> > > commit 2c55b2302875449565674aa039517734cf338031
> > >
> > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/viewer/apache-age-viewer-1.0.0-incubating-rc0/
> > >
> > > The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> > >
> > 8fa45254bba973678243a78321869aaf88c746b55168d4401931c5d6e87192c80d581d97e927c8b87098aaacba8d6f77bf1ca225e864c49117f5cb1887c699d0
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
> > >
> > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > > 0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
> > >
> > > For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alex Kwak
> > >
> >
> 

Reply via email to