Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for Viewer as it is for AGE
@Felix The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was... "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested distribution method." Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most appropriate, or give further specific advice. Thanks Joe On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to > vote too > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo > ________________________________ > From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence > > Shouldn’t this be a vote? > > Please see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356 > ________________________________ > From: Joe Fagan <joe.fa...@bitnine.net> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence > > Dear mentors, > > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at hub.docker.com. > Is it possible to approve the creation of > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer> > > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated build > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer > repository. > > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra Team > with the relevant details. > > Thank you > Joe >