sorrell commented on PR #332: URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/pull/332#issuecomment-2663979503
> > I think these changes help add clarity to the process and the small grammar issue I noted can be cleaned up in a future commit if @jccampagne is unable to address it. Thoughts on merging @jrgemignani @eyab? > > Should it be applied to **master** or **new-web** ? Great question! And this is something I was thinking about opening an issue for, as this repo has pretty confusing branch naming. At this point, the "docs" are generated off `master` and the "marketing" website is build on `new-web`. I think we should clean up that naming, but yes, this PR should go to `master` at this time. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@age.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
