Hi Suresh, I already removed those additional profiles from my local copy. But still I am keeping an additional profile just to build airavata without integration tests. So this change will go with integration tests.
Thanks Amila On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 16, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Heshan Suriyaarachchi > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> These were added earlier as per the requirement of [1]. I don't think these >> build profiles are used now (but I'm not sure) and they are not upto date. >> If these profiles are not needed, it's better to remove them. >> >> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-348 >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Amila Jayasekara >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Root pom.xml contains multiple build profiles. This is bit confusing >>> and it is good if we can have a single (default) build profile. We can >>> build Airavata fairly quickly and I dont see a good reason to have >>> multiple build profiles. Also we cannot make sure all these profiles >>> are upto date. >>> >>> Any objections in keeping default profile and removing rest ? > > Since there was not much discussion on this thread, shall we assume lazy > consensus and clean this up? I anyway want to revisit all the pom's to ensure > LICENSE & NOTICE are up to date. While I am at it, I can clean up the > profiles as well. > > Suresh > >>> Thanks >>> Amila >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Heshan Suriyaarachchi >> >> http://heshans.blogspot.com/ >
