Guys, I think we would end up emulating XBaya at some point down the line. In fact it could be something similar to what Creately [1] provides.
Anyway we need to get few things straight in the first place. 1. Have an object model similar to that of XBaya so that it is possible to edit/run workflows done using XBaya on the Web UI and vice versa. 2. Develop a basic UI framework so that others can build on top of it. This would include different types of widget, menus, log/status windows, etc. 3. The protocol conversion layer (JSON/XML) that needs to be developed in parallel. 4. Make the UI extensible so that new components, etc could be added with relatively little effort. [1] - https://creately.com/app/?tempID=h165rwt81# Lets discuss and come up with a plan as having a solid architecture/base would pay off for sure. Thanks, Danushka On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi > I think keeping in mind the current implementation of the Xbaya, it > would be good if we stick to single page web app with each of us > having our custom modules.We all can come up with a design which can > be used for all the interfaces, it will save the amount of time spend > for designing a page from scratch. > > Regards > Sanchit Aggarwal > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > I had one small query, are all of us (those working on the front end) > > working on a single page web app. > > > > Or will each of us have a page which we will design form top to bottom. > > > > In any case, maybe we can also agree on some common format to reuse the > > objects, so that we do not code replication. > > > > Cheers, > > Subho. > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Here are the all the proposals, please enable the public option, if you > >> haven't previously: > >> > >> Dunushka - > >> > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/danushka/1 > >> Subho - > >> > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/subhobanerjee/13001 > >> Vijayendra - > >> > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/vijayendra_purohit/33001 > >> Sanchit - > >> > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/sanchitaggarwal/24001 > >> Shameera - > >> > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/shameera/60002 > >> Viknes - > >> > http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/vikbalas/1 > >> > >> Suresh > >> > >> > >> On May 31, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Please check now. Sorry about that. > >> > > >> > Danushka > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Danushka > >> >> > >> >> It seems that your proposal is not public. can you please set it to > >> public. > >> >> > >> >> Regards > >> >> Sanchit Aggarwal > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> Hi Vijayendra, > >> >>> > >> >>> That's great!. > >> >>> > >> >>> BTW where to get some insight into what you are trying to do in the > >> first > >> >>> place?. Maybe your proposal would do. > >> >>> > >> >>> Please find mine at [1]. Please go through sections 1.4, 1.5 and > 1.6 to > >> >> get > >> >>> a very high-level idea of what we are planning to do in terms of > >> >> supporting > >> >>> AMQP in WS-Messenger. > >> >>> > >> >>> [1] - > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > https://google-melange.appspot.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/danushka/1 > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> Danushka > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit < > >> >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Hi Dhanushka/All > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I will be involved in one of the sub-project under "Monitoring and > >> >>>> Messaging". As you are handling "AMQP Messaging protocol support > for > >> >>>> Airavata WS-Messenger", We need to come up with framework for > message > >> >>>> monitoring. Can we all start discussing here? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Regards > >> >>>> Vijayendra > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> >
