Hi Sanchit, I am finding a place for json schemas, IMO it is ok to put that under model directory. WDYT?
Thanks, Shameera. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Amila Jayasekara <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks Sanchit for explaining the structure. As discussed in previous mail > I will add test directory to root folder. > Test cases welcome. > > Thanks > Amila > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Amila >> >> The explanation of structure is as follows. >> >> /:. >> ├───index.html ... This is the main xbay UI file,as we are building the 1 >> page application layout of all >> interfaces(workflow composer,execution >> interface,messenger) will reside in this. >> ├───css .... This folder will contain all the stylesheets, the >> one provided by the 3 parties like (twitter >> bootstrap etc) wil go to vendor folder, and one >> customized by us will be at the root of css folder. >> └───vendor >> ├───doc .... all the documentation for the interfaces >> >> ├───img ..... all the images like logos,icons etc >> >> └───js .... custom js will be at the root of js folder >> ├───vendor .... all 3rd party lib like >> jquery,angular,bootstrap.js,jsv.js etc will go here >> ├───model .... all js code, dealing with application data >> └───controlers .. all js code ,affecting the application behavior >> >> >> >> Regards >> Sanchit Aggarwal >> MS Research (Computer Science) >> Center for Visual Information Technology >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli >> Contact - 9581417330 >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Amila, >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Amila Jayasekara < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Below svn structure is now in >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/airavata/sandbox/gsoc2013. >>>> >>>> Also may I know what you meant by "vendor" ? >>>> >>> >>> AFAIK, all 3rd party js files goes to there, eg: jquery.js >>> >>> >>> Further where are you going to place tests cases in below svn structure >>>> ? >>>> >>> >>> What about create a top level directory called "test" for all test >>> cases? >>> >>>> >>>> When submitting patches please let us know where to place code. >>>> >>>> @Shameera : I see you have submitted a js file as a patch to [1]. >>>> Please let me know where to place the file in below svn structure >>>> >>> >>> I think registryAPI.js file should go to js directory. And >>> registryRestService.patch for trunk >>> >>> >>>> and great if you can submit test cases for that as well. >>>> >>> >>> Sure Amila I will provide test cases for this. >>> >>> @Subho could you please explain the structure. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Shameera. >>> >>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-887 >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Amila >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> As discussed and suggested by subho lets have the html5 boilerplate >>>>> structure. >>>>> >>>>> /:. >>>>> ├───index.html >>>>> ├───css >>>>> └───vendor >>>>> ├───doc >>>>> ├───img >>>>> └───js >>>>> ├───vendor >>>>> ├───model >>>>> └───controlers >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal >>>>> MS Research (Computer Science) >>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology >>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli >>>>> Contact - 9581417330 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Hi All, >>>>> > >>>>> > This is indeed great progress. + 1 for regular hangouts amongst >>>>> yourself. >>>>> > And please call out when ever you need help with a specific >>>>> component and >>>>> > we can join in as well. >>>>> > >>>>> > Guys, please *no* for a separate repository. We have so many active >>>>> > committers and you should have your contributions committed to gsoc >>>>> sandbox >>>>> > with minimal latency. We can commit and then review to GSOC sandbox, >>>>> for >>>>> > trunk it will be review and commit so it will be slow. >>>>> > >>>>> > So please suggest a directory strictly and contribute to repos. As >>>>> part of >>>>> > Apache GSOC we are required to teach contributing patches and >>>>> working in >>>>> > this setting. >>>>> > >>>>> > Suresh >>>>> > >>>>> > On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Hi all, >>>>> > > >>>>> > > The session was great and cleared most of the confusion.Apart from >>>>> the >>>>> > > above points it was also decided >>>>> > > >>>>> > > 5. To have a common repository on Git as it easy to merge >>>>> there.Let one >>>>> > of >>>>> > > us create the repo and all others just fork it. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > 6. Also lets define the different stubs as discussed so that >>>>> everyone can >>>>> > > use them. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Regards >>>>> > > Sanchit Aggarwal >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>> > > [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> Hi all, >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> We had a quite fruitful session that helped iron out some of the >>>>> issues >>>>> > >> that we had. It was decided to have hangout sessions at regular >>>>> > intervals >>>>> > >> to help keep the momentum and have everyone on the same page. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> It was decided to have the following action plan for next week. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> 1. Danushka : Submit a patch for the Airavata/AMQP client API >>>>> (initial >>>>> > >> cut). >>>>> > >> 2. Shameera : Submit a patch for the protocol conversion JS API >>>>> (initial >>>>> > >> cut). >>>>> > >> 3. Vijayendra : Submit a patch for the monitoring implementation >>>>> based >>>>> > on >>>>> > >> pub/sub. >>>>> > >> 4. Subho : Discuss the directory structure for UI on dev@ and >>>>> submit a >>>>> > >> patch for workflow composition UI (initial cut). >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Guys, please add whatever that I have missed. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Cheers, >>>>> > >> Danushka >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka < >>>>> > >> [email protected] >>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >>> Hi, >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> In that Hangout we can come to final svn repo structure too, I >>>>> have >>>>> > some >>>>> > >>> code in my local machine and better move it to a safe location. >>>>> I have >>>>> > >>> written JS client interface to call set of registry rest api >>>>> > resources, I >>>>> > >>> have tested and it is working), once this finish ( will finish >>>>> ASAP) >>>>> > >> others >>>>> > >>> can use that for their development. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> Thanks, >>>>> > >>> Shameera. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>>> Hi Amila, >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> Sure I will. >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> Danushka >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Amila Jayasekara < >>>>> > >>> [email protected] >>>>> > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Danushka, >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> If you can publish hangout URL to dev list, some of the people >>>>> in dev >>>>> > >>>> list >>>>> > >>>>> may also be able to join (if available). >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks >>>>> > >>>>> Amila >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura < >>>>> > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> Suresh, >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> We are planning to have a hangout session tonight (IST). I >>>>> will >>>>> > >> keep >>>>> > >>>> the >>>>> > >>>>>> list updated after that. >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>> > >>>>>> Danushka >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Suresh Marru < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> The spike of enthusiasm quickly spurred down. Am i looking >>>>> in the >>>>> > >>>> wrong >>>>> > >>>>>>> svn repo and JIRA, Airavata ones do not show any gsoc >>>>> > >> contributions >>>>> > >>>>> yet. >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> Suresh >>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:43 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected] >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Did all the students gave up on GSOC projects and decided to >>>>> > >> fail >>>>> > >>>> the >>>>> > >>>>>>> mid-term? >>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>>> This is unusually quite period when it is supposed to be >>>>> high >>>>> > >>>> coding >>>>> > >>>>>>> time with atleast 30 -40 hours of coding. Other than sporadic >>>>> > >>>>> questions, >>>>> > >>>>>> I >>>>> > >>>>>>> have not seen any concrete plan yet. >>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Suresh >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> -- >>>>> > >>> Best Regards, >>>>> > >>> Shameera Rathnayaka. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com >>>>> > >>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Shameera Rathnayaka. >>> >>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com >>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> > -- Best Regards, Shameera Rathnayaka. email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
