Hi All,

We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the things need 
to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).

* Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master project
* Test cases for all the code
* Documentation 
* Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal 

Suresh

On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote:

> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a summary of 
> what happened at the hangout...
> 
> Cheers,
> Subho. 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
> 
> Regards
> Vijayendra
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can we have it shortly?
> 
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi Subho, 
> 
> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline. 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues 
> with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another 
> hangout tomorrow at the same time.
> 
> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you 
> guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about conclusions 
> and issues addressed in this hangout session.  
> 
> 
> In general, the problems we are having -
> 
> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are working on)
> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links corresponding 
> to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what is causing the 
> error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served, but they don't have 
> anything about why there was an error.
>  
> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it is 
> possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
> 
> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is 
> there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have 
> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
> 
> I have changed the request URL to 
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this 
> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in json 
> format use 
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
>  if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have 
> handle this inside the registryAPI. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Shameera.
>  
> 
> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> 
> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed --
> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it to 
> the tomcat war.
> 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi Guys, 
> 
> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if one of 
> you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow up the 
> process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration. At the 
> moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened an another 
> thread for it. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Shameera.
>  
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Guys
> 
> Join the hangout at :
> 
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1.
> 
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Guys 
> 
> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note 
> that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US 
> on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST) 
> either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi 
> 
> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it right 
> now.
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it Tuesday 
> morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi 
> 
> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry I couldn't make it.
> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a little 
> more in advance.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have it 
> at 11.30 IST today?
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
> 
> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so that 
> the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer be 
> there with the update URL's
> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk to 
> RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
> 
> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by early 
> next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
> 
> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Join in at 
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> +1 for the approach.
> 
> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world" 
> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution and 
> focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running 
> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
> 
> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
> 
> +1 for 11 PM. 
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a 
> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master 
> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request 
> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as i 
> have some issue in being present after that time. 
> 
> Hope to meet you all in there.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shameera
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way 
> forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it 
> has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility of  
> the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of room 
> for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would give 
> the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort put 
> in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further from 
> there easily (I mean post GSoC).
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC 
> projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a 
> collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think 
> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got deferred 
> until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to have a big 
> picture and how each components will play together, we really unable to get a 
> hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? Its really hard to 
> judge individual contributions. More over if the integration does not come 
> together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
> 
> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a small 
> spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches in? In 
> contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last weeks.
> 
> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works 
> for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm pencil 
> down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, the 
> suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test 
> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard to 
> pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
> 
> Suresh
> 
> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
> 
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >
> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >
> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it 
> > too.
> >
> >
> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has 
> > written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful 
> > at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >
> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular 
> > models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether 
> > a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this 
> > method was unsuccessful.
> >
> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what 
> > else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular 
> > webapp.
> >
> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry 
> > API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we 
> > will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be 
> > easy.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Subho
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho

Reply via email to