This was in accordance with the CIPRES usecase scenario where users would
want to rerun their tasks but with subset of slightly different
parameters/input. This is particularly useful for them because their tasks
can include more than 20-30 parameters most of the time.


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Sachith Withana <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Amila,
>
> The use of the word "cloning" is misleading.
>
> Saminda suggested that, we would need to run the application in a
> different host ( based on the users intuition of the host availability/
> efficiency) keeping all the other variables constant( inputs changes are
> also allowed). As an example: if a job keeps failing on one host, the user
> should be allowed to submit the job to another host.
>
> We should come up with a different name for the scenario..
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Amila Jayasekara <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Sachith Withana <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> This is the summary of the meeting we had Wednesday( 01/16/14) on the
>>> Orchestrator.
>>>
>>> Orchestrator Overview
>>> I Introduced the Orchestrator and I have attached the presentation
>>> herewith.
>>>
>>> Adding Job Cloning capability to the Orchestrator API
>>> Saminda suggested that we should have a way to clone an existing job and
>>> run it with different inputs or on a different host or both. Here's the
>>> Jira for that.[1]
>>>
>>
>> I didnt quite understand what cloning does. Once descriptors are setup we
>> can run experiment with different inputs, many times we want. So what is
>> the actual need to have cloning ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Thejaka Amila
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Gfac embedded vs Gfac as a service
>>> We have implemented the embedded Gfac and decided to use it for now.
>>> Gfac as a service is a long term goal to have. Until we get the
>>> Orchestrator complete we will use the embedded Gfac.
>>>
>>> Job statuses for the Orchestrator and the Gfac
>>> We need to come up with multi-level job statuses. User-level,
>>> Orchestartor-level and the Gfac-level statuses. Also the mapping between
>>> them is open for discussion. We didn't come to a conclusion on the matter.
>>> We will discuss this topic in an upcoming meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-989
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>>  Sachith Withana
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Sachith Withana
>
>

Reply via email to