[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13892352#comment-13892352
 ] 

Suresh Marru edited comment on AIRAVATA-1006 at 2/5/14 5:53 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Chathuri,

This is indeed very intuitive. One a flip side we can look at critically and 
say its too abstract and high level, but I find the abstraction very simple and 
neat. When data models change adding removing fields, this CPI will almost 
require no changes what so ever. Now this will burden all components to focus 
on airavata thrift data models and adapt to changes. But that may anyway 
require and it alleviates form changes to registry cpi as well. Its also very 
clean in the sense that internal organization of the data and the relations 
between them, whether structured, unstructured or semi-structured is now a 
registry implementation detail. 

+ 1 for moving foreword.

How will the update work? lets say if there are some optional values filled in 
and a request comes to update the object with a values for new parameters and 
for some previously set parameters, will all of them be updated? 

How will the transactions be enforced when two non co-ordinating components are 
trying to update the same obejct?

Suresh


was (Author: smarru):
Hi Chathuri,

This is indeed very intuitive. One a flip side we can look at critically and 
say its too abstract and high level, but I find the abstraction very simple and 
near. This will almost require no changes what so ever which changes to data 
models. Now all components only have to focus on airavata thrift data models 
and adopt to changes in it and don't worry about registry cpi changes. Its also 
very clean in the sense that internal organization of the data and the 
relations between them, whether structured, unstructured or semi-structured is 
only a registry implementation detail. + 1 for moving foreward with it.

How will the update work? lets say if there are some optional values filled in 
and a request comes to update the object with a values for new parameters and 
for some previously set parameters, will all of them be updated? 

How will the transactions be enforced when two non co-ordinating components are 
trying to update the same obejct?

Suresh

> Craft the Registry 1.0 CPI
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: AIRAVATA-1006
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-1006
>             Project: Airavata
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Suresh Marru
>             Fix For: 0.12
>
>
> As the Airavata API is evolving towards 1.0 version, we need to refine the 
> currently Registry API (and the current Airavata Client->Registry API) into a 
> unified and well defined Registry CPI. 
> This registry CPI is targeted to be invoked by the Airavata API functions and 
> use of Registry by all internal Airavata internal components like 
> Orchestrator, Workflow Interpreter and GFac.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to