Hi Mark,

Yes its definitely logged in airavata logs and we are hoping to pass them
to the gateway.

Lahiru


On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes. I think the error information needs to be exposed. Especially when it
> comes to long-running operations where recreating an issue would likely to
> be a bit of a hassle.
>
> /Danushka
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Miller, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Remember, I am on the naïve side so I am not saying what should be in
>> terms of implementation.
>> Certainly, passing to the Gateway for storage in the Gateway database is
>> a good solution for the Gateway.
>>
>> I was wondering if the Airavata operators might need access to the same
>> information, for debugging purposes.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marlon Pierce [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:33 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Validation failures and storing the failures
>>
>> I was assuming the gateway would figure out what to do with the errors
>> after step 4.  This obviously needs more thought on how this would work.
>>
>> Marlon
>>
>> On 5/14/14 3:27 PM, Miller, Mark wrote:
>> > I feel as long as they are stored somewhere, that should be fine.
>> > The question is, if Airavata doesn't have access to the gateway
>> database, will they be hamstrung by the inability to retrieve failure
>> messages that might be informative?
>> > Maybe everything will be in the logs anyhow?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Marlon Pierce [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:23 PM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: Validation failures and storing the failures
>> >
>> > I don't think these need to be stored, just sent back to the gateway.
>> > If I recall correctly, steps are
>> >
>> > 1. Gateway invokes "execute" method of API server.
>> >
>> > 2. API Server runs Orchestrator's "validate()".
>> >
>> > 3. Orch returns result of validation.
>> >
>> > 4. API server returns results to the gateway.
>> >
>> > 5. If validation passed, API Server then runs the Orchestrator's
>> "launch()".
>> >
>> > So step #4 should enough.
>> >
>> > Marlon
>> >
>> >
>> > On 5/14/14 12:17 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> We recently added validation logics to orchestrator, so gateway
>> >> developers can add/configure their validators to be invoked. If they
>> >> failed they can wrap an error message in their validation logic and
>> return that.
>> >> Orchestrator needs to take these error messages and store them to a
>> >> persistent storage so that if the validation failed these errors can
>> >> be showed to the gateway user to make it correct. Unless we give a
>> >> proper error message to the end user there is no way to make it
>> correct.
>> >>
>> >> Currently in the orchestrator implementation it does not store the
>> >> error but we have a proper result object which keeps the validation
>> >> state and a message.
>> >>
>> >> Where should I save this information in our data model ? This is an
>> >> information specific to each invocation and there could be multiple
>> >> error messages came from multiple validators because we do not return
>> >> immediately after the first validation failure but rather we invoke
>> >> all the validators and collect all the errors (currently we just have
>> >> access to them and simply logging those errors in server side). If
>> >> there is no placeholder for these validation errors can we add
>> >> something to the data model to store them and retrieve them from the
>> client code ?
>> >>
>> >> I have added FAQ type of a document for Orchestrator[1], please
>> >> provide your feedback on this.
>> >>
>> >> [1]
>> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FOc0X6HCMZ9E-fTnZQ8aGo7tK20C8lvKl
>> >> y
>> >> cNouswICI/edit
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Lahiru
>> >>
>>
>>
>


-- 
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University

Reply via email to