Thanks Gourav for the update. So, we will have to implement multiple
load balancers in-order to avoid a single point of failure.

However, now I am facing an issue with binding the ports in consul and
ha-proxy. Within the openstack, there is no provision to access the public
ip of an instance. Hence, ha-proxy, consul-template and consul are
accessing the private IP of the portal server.

I haven't moved the setup to production. This was the case when I tried
implementing the dummy concept on TACC openstack. So, is there a way in
which I can access the floating IP of instances within an instance?

Thanks,
Jerrin

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Shenoy, Gourav Ganesh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Jerrin,
>
>
>
> Avoiding a single point of failure for the load balancer is tricky. But
> typically, a good approach is to have multiple load balancers (for HA) and
> a floating IP which maps to an “active” load balancer – this is assuming we
> have an Active-Passive type HA cluster for the load balancer. Container
> orchestration engines such as Kubernetes/DCOS provide such features
> out-of-the-box; same goes with public clouds such as AWS or GCE. Privately
> managed cloud like OpenStack will need some complex configuring to enable
> such DNS mapping.
>
>
> Hope this helps!
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Gourav Shenoy
>
>
>
> *From: *Jerrin Suresh <[email protected]>
> *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 3:31 PM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> *Subject: *Re: Working on Load Balancers
>
>
>
> The main idea of implementing a load balancer is to balance the load to
> the portal and remove any single point of failure. However, after
> implementing the load balancer, the load balancer itself becomes a single
> point of failure.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts regarding the same? Should we have multiple load balancers
> involved, i.e a master and a slave or a dual master setup?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Christie, Marcus Aaron <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> No plans. But if it makes sense to do so we could.
>
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 10:03 AM, Jerrin Suresh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Just a quick question, do you have plans of dockerizing the Django portal?
>
>
>
>
>
> ~jerrin
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Jerrin Suresh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the update. I shall set the load balancer up for a sample
> application, and am planning to use haproxy for the project.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerrin
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Christie, Marcus Aaron <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Jerrin,
>
>
>
> What specifically do you want to work on regarding load balancing?
> Depending on what you want to work on, load balancing a web application is
> fairly independent of the web application framework.  So I would say for
> now you could just try load balancing any web application, even a simple
> little one written in either Laravel or Django (or another framework).
>
>
>
> We run the PHP PGA and Django PGA in Apache HTTPD server.  So it would be
> good if the load balancing work you do works with Apache HTTPD. However,
> I’m open to using something else like nginx or whatever if you can make a
> good case for it.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Jerrin Suresh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am working on setting up Load Balancers for Apache Airavata. However, as
> the PGA is being moved to the Django framework is it better to work on the
> PGA branch or should I work on the Django branch?
>
>
>
>
> ~jerrin
>
> --
>
> MS CS Fall-2018
>
> Indiana University
> www.linkedin.com/in/jerrinsuresh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> MS CS Fall-2018
>
> Indiana University
> www.linkedin.com/in/jerrinsuresh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> MS CS Fall-2018
>
> Indiana University
> www.linkedin.com/in/jerrinsuresh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> MS CS Fall-2018
>
> Indiana University
> www.linkedin.com/in/jerrinsuresh
>
>
>



-- 
MS CS Fall-2018
Indiana University
www.linkedin.com/in/jerrinsuresh

Reply via email to