This only may make sense for test/training deployments and not in any production. But should be gotten rid of and replaced by insisting on the specification of a gateway instance and user and throwing if they are missing with pointers to where and how they need to be set.
Sudhakar. > On Oct 20, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Christie, Marcus Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dev, > > The Registry has a notion of a default user [1] and a default gateway. Do > these concepts even make sense in the multi-tenanted Airavata? Can they be > removed or are they important? > > Thanks, > > Marcus > > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/airavata/blob/master/modules/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/airavata/common/utils/ServerSettings.java#L149
