Based on my experience porting it to SimCCS gateway, I think the effort is small as long as the other component is also written in Java. I ended up changing only a little bit of the code, but certainly there are few bugs we encountered during the progress.
Ian On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Pierce, Marlon <[email protected]> wrote: > We have seen the interest. I’m wondering how much work needs to be done to > generalize the current SEAGrid desktop tools so that they are easily > deployable by new gateway tenants. > > > > Marlon > > > > *From: *Suresh Marru <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, November 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM > *To: *Airavata Dev <[email protected]> > *Subject: *[DISCUSS] SEAGrid Rich Client to Airavata > > > > Hi All, > > > > In discussing with some of Airavata users at Supercomputing conference, > there seems to be an increasing interest in desktop application > interrogations with Airavata. Any opinions on bringing seagrid rich client > to Airavata (https://github.com/SciGaP/seagrid-rich-client), generalize > it and make the third party interfaces into a plugin model? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Suresh > > > -- ==================================================== Ian (Yinzhi) Wang Research Geophysicist Indiana Geological & Water Survey Indiana University 1001 East 10th Street Bloomington, IN 47405 ====================================================
