How about sqlite? I believe it only runs with Sequential Executor? On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:59 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > I've just had a thought: the sequential executor is gives an all around > pretty bad experience (it blocks the scheduler, you'll see "scheduler > stopped heartbeating" messages if your task run takes a while. > > So I'd like to propose we change the default executor to LocalExecutor -- > to do this we should probably change the default number of slots/processes > from 16 to num cpus. > > Thoughts? > > None of this has to happen for 2.0 (I don't have time to do it), but just > wanted to suggest it. > > -ash > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
