Hello everyone,

I've already started a discussion about this on the Airflow discussions: 
https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315

As we have multiple DAG's interacting with MS Graph API endpoints, and as we 
want to avoid custom code as much as possible as we have to handle lot's of 
data due to paging.
We thought of implementing an operator for it using the official python client 
from Microsoft<https://github.com/microsoftgraph/msgraph-sdk-python>, that way 
we can simplify our DAGs and remove custom code as much as possible.
That's why we implemented an MSGraph SDK Provider which is on 
GitHub<https://github.com/infrabel/apache-airflow-providers-msgraph> and also 
published it as an artifact on 
PyPi<https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-msgraph/>.

As Jarek pointed out in the pull request for Third Party 
providers<https://github.com/apache/airflow-site/pull/933>, it's not a good 
idea to use the apache-airflow prefix for the library as it is not maintained 
by the Apache community (yet).
So there are 2 options, or we change the name or we donate the project to the 
Apache Airflow community, which I think the later one is the best option if 
there is interest to do it, hence why I also started a 
discussion<https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315> about it a few 
weeks ago on GitHub<https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/36315>.

Kind regards,
David

Reply via email to