I think our previous consensus was “dag" or “dags", but recent PRs, including mine, have changed them to "Dag". I’m fine with "Dag" or “dag” (like “dag” a bit more) as long as it’s not “DAG”.
I believe we should better document the decision this time. I can create that PR once we finalize it again here. Best, Wei > On Aug 31, 2025, at 9:13 PM, Daniel Standish > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote: > > Saw this PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55097 > > I thought we discussed this at some point that using just "dag" or "dags" > is perfectly fine. De-emphasizing the mathy origin of the "DAG" concept. > > Personally I believe we should leave instances of "dag" or "dags" in the > docs alone. > > Is the consensus I recall just an invention of my mind? > > Thanks --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
