Would this really necessitate a new provider? Should this just be baked
into the common SQL provider?

Alternatively, instead of a narrow `sql-ai` provider, why not have a
generic common ai provider with a SQL package, which would allow for us to
build AI-based subpackages into the provider other than just SQL?

On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 4:31 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <[email protected]>
wrote:

> @Giorgio Yes indeed that's also a good thought to integrate. I will keep in
> mind to think about when I draft AIP and message about this a bit more :)
> Yes please join. We have great demos packed on this topic :)
>
> @kaxil , Yes that's a great blog post from the wren AI and leveraging the
> Apache DataFusion as a query engine to connect to different data sources.
>
> Pavan
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 7:37 PM Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Pavan,
> > Some notes:
> > 1. LLM can be also very useful in detecting root causes of your error
> while
> > developing and design a pipeline. I explain me better, we'd in the past
> > several
> > Spark processes, when it is all green is ok, but when on fails, it will
> be
> > nice to have a tool integrated to ask why.
> > 2. Ideally such operator could be a ModelContextProtocolOperator and you
> > would not need nothing else that put an LLM as parameter with that
> > operator,
> > and just call for tools, execute query, and so on. This would be more
> > powerful, because you create an abstraction between devices, databases,
> > server and so on, so each source of data can be injected on the pipeline.
> > 3.  Good job! Looking forward to see the presentation.
> > Best Regards,
> > Giorgio
> >
> > Il giorno mar 30 set 2025 alle ore 14:51 Pavankumar Gopidesu <
> > [email protected]> ha scritto:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > We're exploring adding LLM-powered SQL operators to Airflow and would
> > love
> > > community input before writing an AIP.
> > >
> > > The idea: Let users write natural language prompts like "find customers
> > > with missing emails" and have Airflow generate safe SQL queries with
> full
> > > context about your database schema, connections, and data sensitivity.
> > >
> > > Why this matters:
> > >
> > >
> > > Most of us spend too much time on schema drift detection and manual
> data
> > > quality checks. Meanwhile, AI agents are getting powerful but lack
> > > production-ready data integrations. Airflow could bridge this gap.
> > >
> > > Here's what we're dealing with at Tavant:
> > >
> > >
> > > Our team works with multiple data domain teams producing data in
> > different
> > > formats and storage across S3, PostgreSQL, Iceberg, and Aurora. When
> data
> > > assets become available for consumption, we need:
> > >
> > > - Detection of breaking schema changes between systems
> > >
> > > - Data quality assessments between snapshots
> > >
> > > - Validation that assets meet mandatory metadata requirements
> > >
> > > - Lookup validation against existing data (comparing file feeds with
> > > different formats to existing data in Iceberg/Aurora)
> > >
> > > This is exactly the type of work that LLMs  could automate while
> > > maintaining governance.
> > >
> > > What we're thinking:
> > >
> > > ```python
> > >
> > > # Instead of writing complex SQL by hand...
> > >
> > > quality_check = LLMSQLQueryOperator(
> > >
> > >     task_id="find_data_issues",
> > >
> > >     prompt="Find customers with invalid email formats and missing phone
> > > numbers",
> > >
> > >     data_sources=[customer_asset],  # Airflow knows the schema
> > > automatically
> > >
> > >     # Built-in safety: won't generate DROP/DELETE statements
> > >
> > > )
> > >
> > > ```
> > >
> > > The operator would:
> > >
> > > - Auto-inject database schema, sample data, and connection details
> > >
> > > - Generate safe SQL (blocks dangerous operations)
> > >
> > > - Work across PostgreSQL, Snowflake, BigQuery with dialect awareness
> > >
> > > - Support schema drift detection between systems
> > >
> > > - Handle multi-cloud data via Apache DataFusion[1] (Did some
> experiments
> > > with 50M+          records and results are in 10-15 seconds for common
> > > aggregations)
> > >
> > > for more info on benchmarks [2]
> > >
> > > Key benefit: Assets become smarter with structured metadata (schema,
> > > sensitivity, format) instead of just throwing everything in `extra`.
> > >
> > > Implementation plan:
> > >
> > > Start with a separate provider (`apache-airflow-providers-sql-ai`) so
> we
> > > can iterate without touching the Airflow core. No breaking changes,
> works
> > > with existing connections and hooks.
> > >
> > > I am presenting this at Airflow Summit 2025 in Seattle with Kaxil -
> come
> > > see the live demo!
> > >
> > > Next steps:
> > >
> > > If this resonates after the Summit, we'll write a proper AIP with
> > technical
> > > details and further build a working prototype.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Concerns? Better ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]: https://datafusion.apache.org/
> > >
> > > [2]:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://datafusion.apache.org/blog/2024/11/18/datafusion-fastest-single-node-parquet-clickbench/
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Pavan
> > >
> > > P.S. - Happy to share more technical details with anyone interested.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Life is a chess game - Anonymous.
> >
>

Reply via email to