We are running 1.7.0 in prod for about a month as well. It's working well
for us now, but we had to cherry pick the scheduler fix:
https://github.com/airbnb/airflow/pull/1374

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Dan Davydov <[email protected]
> wrote:

> All of the blockers were fixed as of yesterday (there was some issue that
> Jeremiah was looking at with the last release candidate which I think is
> fixed but I'm not sure). I started staging the airbnb_1.7.1rc3 tag earlier
> today, so as long as metrics look OK and the 1.7.1rc2 issues seem resolved
> tomorrow I will release internally either tomorrow or Monday (we try to
> avoid releases on Friday). If there aren't any issues we can push the 1.7.1
> tag on Monday/Tuesday.
>
> @Sid
> I think we were originally aiming to deploy internally once every two weeks
> but we decided to do it once a month in the end. I'm not too sure about
> that so Max can comment there.
>
> We have been running 1.7.0 in production for about a month now and it
> stable.
>
> I think what really slowed down this release cycle is some commits that
> caused severe bugs that we decided to roll-forward with instead of rolling
> back. We can potentially try reverting these commits next time while the
> fixes are applied for the next version, although this is not always trivial
> to do.
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Siddharth Anand <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Btw, is anyone of the committers running 1.7.0 or later in any staging or
> > production env? I have to say that given that 1.6.2 was the most stable
> > release and is 4 or more months old does not say much for our release
> > cadence or process. What's our plan for 1.7.1?
> >
> > Sent from Sid's iPhone
> >
> > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I just wanted to check in on the 1.7.1 release status. I know there
> have
> > > been some major-ish bugs, as well as several people doing tests. Should
> > we
> > > create a 1.7.1 release JIRA, and track outstanding issues there?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to