Hey, Please check out http://coala-analyzer.org for static analysis, it's awesome! http://gitmate.com is able to run these checks automatically for PRs. See https://github.com/coala-analyzer/coala/pull/2220 for a live example (hover over the green checkmark next to the commit hash).
I'd love to see as many things copied from coala's CI system as possible — they even have automatic pypi prerelease version deployments for each merge! On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:46 PM Paul Rhodes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > > I've asked a few of the committers about this but thought I'd ping this to > the list. > > > We've integrated landscape.io to do automated code checks and as of right > now it's flagging 8 Errors, 416 Smells and 784 Style alerts. I've had a > look at some of these and thought I might pick off some of the lower > hanging fruit in this area, but I'd just like to understand if improving > the static code scores is seen to be of value right now... > > > I'd like to see the scores improve, but like the testing and the changes > to model.py, it's a big job which touches a significant number of lines of > code. > > > Of course, it's also fine if we choose to keep the codebase as-is but if > that's the case we should adjust .landscape.yml to a profile that is > tailored to alert on only the things we care about. (For example, I would > be in favour of allowing _(\w+) in the pylint dummy variable syntax to > allow context to be maintained for dummy variables)) > > > cheers > > > Paul >
