Hey Lance,

Can't say that I have. Can you provide more details about your DAG? A
reproducible test is always helpful, too, though it sounds like it's
non-deterministic.

Cheers,
Chris

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Lance Norskog <[email protected]>
wrote:

> We see a regular case of an off-by-one problem in the active DAG list.
> Every so often, the list is translated one forwards. The first DAG stays
> on. The second DAG turns on. From then onward every DAG 'running' status is
> what should be the one before it in the list.
>
> Anyone seen this one before? We're on 1.7.1.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Lance Norskog
> [email protected]
> Redwood City, CA
>

Reply via email to