The task dependency engine code is well commented, but I can provide a high
level overview specifically for developers if there is interest (note that
this would be the first documentation of it's kind in that it would be
developer-only documentation). The disadvantage is that it would create
duplication with the logic itself on quite a large scale. Let me know Bolke.

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>
wrote:

> @bolke, this sounds like a good list.
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok.
> >
> > For now to call it “beta” 4 items seems to be left:
> >
> > Blocker:
> > * retry_delay not respected
> > * poison pill due to re-queue before process has finished (to be
> > investigated)
> >
> > Features:
> > * cgroups + impersonation
> > * dag.catchup (Ben Tallman -> Only documentation is missing).
> >
> > PRs that contain documentation would really be appreciated. In my opinion
> > we are lacking there. Think about docs covering:
> > * new scheduler behaviour and options
> > * task dependency engine
> > * api / kerberized api
> > * …
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bolke
> >
> > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 18:59, Arthur Wiedmer <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > We can always think about different ways of doing this later (fair
> share
> > > scheduling etc...)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Arthur
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dear All,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to drop "Schedule all pending DAG runs in a single
> > scheduler
> > >> loop” from the 1.8.0 release (updated: https://github.com/apache/
> > >> incubator-airflow/pull/1980 <https://github.com/apache/
> > >> incubator-airflow/pull/1980>, original: https://github.com/apache/
> > >> incubator-airflow/pull/1906 <https://github.com/apache/
> > >> incubator-airflow/pull/1906>). The reason for this is that it, imho,
> > >> biases the scheduler towards a single DAG as it fills the queue with
> > tasks
> > >> from one DAG and then goes to the next DAG. Starving DAGs that come
> > after
> > >> the first for resources. As such it should be updated and that will
> take
> > >> time.
> > >>
> > >> Please let me know if I am incorrect.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Bolke
> > >>
> > >>> On 10 Jan 2017, at 09:25, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Dear All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have made Airflow 1.8.0 alpha 4 available at
> > >> https://people.apache.org/~bolke/ <https://people.apache.org/~bolke/>
> .
> > >> Again no Apache release yet - this is for testing purposes. I consider
> > this
> > >> Alpha to be a Beta if not for the pending features. If the pending
> > features
> > >> are merged within a reasonable time frame (except for **, as no
> progress
> > >> currently) then I am planning to mark the tarball as Beta and only
> allow
> > >> bug fixes and (very) minor features. This week hopefully.
> > >>>
> > >>> Blockers:
> > >>>
> > >>> * None
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixed issues
> > >>> * Regression in email
> > >>> * LDAP case sensitivity
> > >>> * one_failed task not being run: now seems to pass suddenly (so
> fixed?)
> > >> -> need to investigate why
> > >>> * Email attachments
> > >>> * Pinned jinja2 to < 2.9.0 (2.9.1 has a confirmed regression)
> > >>> * Improve time units for task performance charts
> > >>> * XCom throws an duplicate / locking error
> > >>> * Add execution_date to trigger_dag
> > >>>
> > >>> Pending features:
> > >>> * DAG.catchup : minor changes needed, documentation still required,
> > >> integration tests seem to pass flawlessly
> > >>> * Cgroups + impersonation: clean up of patches on going, more tests
> and
> > >> more elaborate documentation required. Integration tests not executed
> > yet
> > >>> * Schedule all pending DAG runs in a single scheduler loop: no
> progress
> > >> (**)
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers!
> > >>> Bolke
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to