Hi,

I just rebuilt + pushed the docs manually, and updated the wiki page as to
how to do it.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Building+and+deploying+the+docs

We may want to automate this in the future though I hit a few bumps when
trying to do that in the past.

Here's the doc entry:
https://airflow.apache.org/security.html?highlight=impersonation#impersonation

Max


On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:37 AM, Michael Gong <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Dan,
>
> The only doc mentioning "run_as" was in the airflow.operators.
> HiveOperator.
>
> Is this what you mean "run_as"?
>
> If not, can you provide more information about it? We are very interested
> to know more .
>
> Thanks.
> Michael
>
> Sent from my PP•KING™ smartphone
>
> On Mar 3, 2017 3:57 PM, Michael Gong <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Dan,
>
>
> Thanks for the encouraging news.
>
>
> Maybe you could direct me to the documentation about "run_as" so I could
> see whether it is for my purpose.
>
>
> I guess it will be passed as an argument for the DAG object , right ?
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dan Davydov <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 8:44 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Airflow running different with different user id ?
>
> Within a couple of weeks.
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Michael Gong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > When approximately will it be released?
> >
> > Sent from my PP•KING™ smartphone
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2017 1:42 PM, Dan Davydov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > Yes it is starting on 1.8.0 which will be released soon, you can look in
> > the documentation/grep for "run_as".
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2017 8:50 AM, "Michael Gong" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > Suppose I have 1 airflow instance running 2 different DAGs, is it
> > possible
> > > to specify the 2 DAGs running under 2 different ids ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Any advises are welcomed.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to