If we can point to the public thread where this intention was discussed, then it's great. If, however, there's no public discussion, then it's a point against graduation since it means a pretty big decision is being kicked around in a non inclusive manner. We just need to be able to cite sources on these kinds of items...
On 5 April 2017 at 14:56, Gurer Kiratli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Jakob, > > So is it okay to mention the intent to graduate in the podling report? > > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Jakob Homan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 5 April 2017 at 10:33, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > If you can please include our intention to graduate after the 1.8.1 >> release (no more reports ;-). >> >> Did I miss this discussion on the mailing list? If so, can you point >> me to it? If it was discussed there; there may be some work to do >> before graduation. :) >> >> Also, graduation doesn't obviate the reports. Instead of reporting to >> the IPMC, we will report to the Board. The reports are pretty much >> the same and are quarterly. >> >> -Jakob >>
