Yep Sent from my iPhone
> On 27 Jul 2017, at 19:00, Maxime Beauchemin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I need to re-package it with build instructions. I'm pretty sure this means > another vote. I have time carved up to work on this today/tomorrow. > > Max > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> IMO, given the level of effort for 1.8.2, and how long it's taken, we >> should not be re-voting right now unless something horrific happened to the >> release. >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Pavel Martynov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, folks! >>> >>> AIRFLOW-935 issue marked as resolved and fix version is 1.8.2, but this >>> commit contained in master branch only and not tagged by 1.8.2rc2. >>> Can fix of this issue be released in 1.8.2? >>> >>> 2017-07-26 2:27 GMT+03:00 George Leslie-Waksman < >>> [email protected]>: >>> >>>> I've checked and we are no longer relying on the previous >>>> LatestOnlyOperator behavior for any of our DAGs. >>>> >>>> This is not a dealbreaker (though I will need to keep it in mind). >>>> >>>> Thanks for asking, >>>> --George >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:50 PM Maxime Beauchemin < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> [AIRFLOW-1296] is part of 1.8.2. >>>>> >>>>> Is this a dealbreaker for 1.8.2? >>>>> >>>>> Max >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:40 PM, George Leslie-Waksman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I hope that it's not too late for me to chime in but there is a >>>> breaking >>>>>> change in the behavior of LatestOnlyOperator. >>>>>> >>>>>> The change was introduced in >>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2365 >>>>>> Change: 333e0b3 [AIRFLOW-1296] Propagate SKIPPED to all downstream >>>> tasks >>>>>> >>>>>> Prior to this change, the LatestOnlyOperator would skip direct >>>> downstream >>>>>> but not indirect downstream; now it skips indirect downstream. >>>>>> >>>>>> This breaks the use of LatestOnlyOperator with TriggerRules that do >>> not >>>>>> propagate skips. >>>>>> >>>>>> --George >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:08 PM Maxime Beauchemin < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I'm gathering a good picture of what is expected here. >> I'll >>>> try >>>>>> to >>>>>>> update the Confluence page as I go. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm hoping to get started tomorrow and package it early next >> week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Max >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:16 PM, siddharth anand < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FYI, can anyone pictorially describe the release process (and >>> post >>>> it >>>>>> on >>>>>>>> the apache airflow wiki)? I think that would eliminate a lot of >>>>>> confusion >>>>>>>> in the future and avoid a rehash of this email thread on the >> next >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -s >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Hitesh Shah < >> [email protected] >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To add, the main source tarball should have instructions to >>>>> generate >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> sdist and bdist versions. Additionally, as part of the >> release >>>>>> process >>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>> the plan is to publish to pypi (after the IPMC vote >> succeeds), >>>> then >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> appropriate bits also need to be verified/voted upon. There >> are >>>> not >>>>>>>> exactly >>>>>>>>> counted as the official release bits but they do need to be >>>>> verified >>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> part of the voting process to ensure that the bits do indeed >>> map >>>> to >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> source release, license/notice files are correct, etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>>> -- Hitesh >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Bolke de Bruin < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Hitesh. We discussed it with John Ament on the IPMC. >>>>> Python >>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> notion of 3 types of distributions, “source”, “sdist”, >>> “bdist”, >>>>>>>> contrary >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> Java that knows only two (source, bdist). We used to vote >> on >>>>>> “sdist”, >>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>> was deemed incorrect. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, Max, indeed we need to vote on a tar.gz that contains >>> build >>>>>>>>>> instructions in INSTALL to get to “sdist”. The build >>>> instructions >>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>> also contain instruction how to run the license checks by >>>> Apache >>>>>> Rat. >>>>>>>>> Most >>>>>>>>>> of the work probably goes in the build instructions and >>>> verifying >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>> work, but it should not be much. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any other clarification required? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> with best regards, Pavel Martynov >>> >>
