> On Jul 26, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Jawahar Panchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Can you explain what is solved by the patch? It only seems to set a empty 
>> default value? 
>> 
>> If that solves it it also seems to be a bug with celery. Or did you set some 
>> options? That would be great to share. 
>> 
> 
> Apologies - forgot to include that the config option that was set via 
> BROKER_TRANSPORT_OPTIONS was the visibility_timeout which I configured to >1d 
> in seconds. So not sure if that is something that should be set in the config 
> template with a sane default (say 1d), or if it should just be documented and 
> the config should be left with empty broker_transport_option json.
> 

Hi again - just wanted to see if 1.8.2 was already built/ready for release to 
see if this is includable, or whether it will have to wait for 1.8.3?


> Cheers,
> J
> 
> 
>> Bolke 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 26 Jul 2017, at 19:44, Jawahar Panchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Howdy - wanted to provide an update - the following patch applied manually 
>>> to a clean 1.8.1 install addressed the issue:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2143 
>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2143>
>>> 
>>> We have confirmed/verified this with jobs running over multiple hours on 
>>> our instance - so the above pull request can close both of the below:
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-966 
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-966>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1258 
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1258>
>>> 
>>> As I have seen further discussion on 1.8.2 with the final build not being 
>>> tagged yet (iirc), would it be possibly to merge this for the 1.8.2 
>>> release? As it currently is, someone using Airflow+Celery will have a 
>>> broken configuration for long-running jobs - would the dev team consider 
>>> this major/critical enough to include?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> J
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:15 PM, Jawahar Panchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi again!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 16, 2017, at 3:22 AM, Alex Guziel <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think this may be related to a celery bug. I'll follow up with more
>>>>> details later.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Just replying back to the note earlier in the thread - apologies for the 
>>>> earlier top-posting, got a bit excited that I might have found the issue, 
>>>> and of course lack of sleep results in one doing terrible, terrible 
>>>> things… :)
>>>> 
>>>> Any idea if my suspicion around the 1h default visibility timeout between 
>>>> celery/redis is the culprit?
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 12:56 AM Jawahar Panchal <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am currently running a couple of long-running tasks on a
>>>>>> database/dataset at school for a project that results in behavior/log
>>>>>> output similar to what was flagged in this bug:
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1258 <
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-1258>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Wasn’t sure if anyone on the list had seen anything similar, or would 
>>>>>> know
>>>>>> what I can do to possibly debug further/patch. As it takes 1hr to test a
>>>>>> change, needless to say any pointers from the dev team on the right
>>>>>> direction to look within the codebase would be much appreciated! :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks in advance for everyone’s/anyone's time and help - am not an
>>>>>> Airflow expert, but am hopefully learning quickly enough to help resolve
>>>>>> this issue (if I am ‘barking up the right tree’ with this bug number…)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> J
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> J
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to