Re: "FIXME: Rescheduling due to concurrency limits reached at task runtime."
The short version of the above question is:
Can someone point me to one of:

   - the person who wrote the "FIXME" to explain it.
   - A Jira Issue tracking the FIX proposal or progress.
   - A design document or email thread about what is expected to be fixed
   at this point in models and jobs.

Thanks!
-Daniel

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Lamblin [Data Science & Platform
Center] <[email protected]> wrote:

> Let me know if you really do need emails entirely in plaintext.
>
> It seems there was a fix AIRFLOW-1074 which prevents tasks which a worker
> rejected from getting orphaned and queued indefinitely. Here's a link to
> the commit
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/commit/70024935f24e0ff3d2861c0ccfa69cdd38084b9d>
> I could find.
> That fix reads to me as though it was meant to address the FIXME in models
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/cfc2f73c445074e1e09d6ef6a056cd2b33a945da/airflow/models.py#L1355>
>  and
> possibly also the FIXME in jobs
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/cfc2f73c445074e1e09d6ef6a056cd2b33a945da/airflow/jobs.py#L1967>
> .
>
> Those messages weren't removed and I'm investigating one case of a job
> that logged these in my cluster, though we're running 1.8.2.
>
> Do I misunderstand the fix, was it considered partial or incomplete? Is
> there an archive of the discussion around it (I only found one email about
> someone being told his issue would be fixed in 1.8.2) what would have to be
> done further to fix and remove the FIXME?
>
> Thanks!
> --
> -Daniel Lamblin
>



-- 
-Daniel Lamblin
  • Indefinitely Queued Ta... Daniel Lamblin [Data Science & Platform Center]
    • Re: Indefinitely ... Daniel Lamblin [Data Science & Platform Center]

Reply via email to