I just restarted it, not sure how long it will take to get in a bad state
again...

Max

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Driesprong, Fokko <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Good morning,
>
> The demo provided by Max is down, it throws a SQLAlchemyexception :'(
>
> Cheers, Fokko
>
> 2017-11-18 19:14 GMT+01:00 Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>:
>
> > @bolke, open issues on the Github repo, please.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > Do you want us to report bugs somewhere (I have encountered a few)? Or
> > > just generic user experiences posted here?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Bolke
> > >
> > > > On 18 Nov 2017, at 00:47, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I know the weekend is coming up, and for those of us in the US, next
> > week
> > > > is a bit of a slow holiday week. Would love to get some feedback from
> > > > everyone on this. The goal would ideally to be to converge on this
> and
> > > > eventually replace the existing Airflow UI with this one.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Joy Gao <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi guys.
> > > >>
> > > >> I've been working on moving airflow from Flask-Admin to
> > Flask-AppBuilder
> > > >> for RBAC
> > > >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/
> > > Airflow+RBAC+proposal
> > > >>> ,
> > > >> check it out at https://github.com/wepay/airflow-webserver.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's still a work-in-progress, but most features you see in the
> > > webserver
> > > >> UI today is available there. For those who are interested in RBAC,
> I'd
> > > love
> > > >> to get some early feedback in terms of the following:
> > > >>
> > > >> - New Flask-AppBuilder UI (any bugs/regressions)
> > > >> - Setup issues
> > > >> - Ease of integration with third party auth (i.e. LDAP, AD, OAuth,
> > etc.)
> > > >> - Any other thoughts/concerns
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks a lot!
> > > >>
> > > >> Cheers,
> > > >> Joy
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to